Please keep on topic fellas.
Cheers
Cheers
I looked at the original ads from August 2016 Reg. (Some are on this forum from discussion at that time).Reg Wilson said:Oh, I get it. False claims are different from exaggerations. And by the way ; the claim was "you can expect 30% extra depth".
Gimp said:He's running out of places to stick antennas and PVC tubing.
mbasko said:I looked at the original ads from August 2016 Reg. (Some are on this forum from discussion at that time).Reg Wilson said:Oh, I get it. False claims are different from exaggerations. And by the way ; the claim was "you can expect 30% extra depth".
None of them say "you can expect 30% extra depth".
They all say "Deeper detection (average 30%*) *depending on prevailing conditions.
The original box has AV. 30%* DEEPER.
Bit of smoke & mirrors from Minelab I guess Or not....
I wonder under what prevailing conditions can Matt pick up gold from over ~40m away with his "radar". ]
Let's see what do we know:
It's got to be buried
It's got to be yellow (rocks can fool it )
Seems you have to know that you've buried the gold there for the radar to see it
It's a complete scam & works in no provable way under any conditions.
Completely different & no comparison to Minelab claims.
I've seen the GPZ19 pick up gold off a patch the GPZ14 missed. What percentage do you attribute to that? In other cases there was nothing more. So from 0% to ~200%+? An average of 30% deeper isn't so mind boggling, exaggerated or false?
No different to car manufacturers claiming fuel consumption rates which they do under test conditions & would have data to back up. The average driver won't replicate those figures in most cases.
Me thinks Minelab would have data & results (under test conditions) to back themselves on claims?
Me thinks Matt has got jack ***** in the way of any proof, test results or ability to verify his "claims". Totally different scenario. :Y:
Edit: P.s. I wasn't a fan of the GPZ19 at all until seeing it in action first hand this winter (might have been the prevailing conditions ). Still wouldn't be my first choice coil on the Zed though.
Manpa said:I had to laugh, his offsider picks up one unit and groans likes its heavy, five minutes later he is holding them both and saying how light they are. Hollow boxes would be light, wouldn't they!
I wonder how he reacts when challenged.
Ded Driver said:I think we are done here. That is, until the military tell us they are successfully using them to locate land mines, IED, UXO etc :bomb:
Ideometer effect at best, same as divining/dowsing, but as seen in his videos (there are many) he is obviously manipulating the "radar" with hand/fingers by stopping it & wrist tilts etc. Nothing divine about it!sand surfer said:i agree wishfull the only thing they detect are the poor not so bright people that buy them i do not know if there is any water diviners out there but watching the vid his so called radar acts the same if i use 1 wire when diving as i get closer to the stream the wire moves left or right when in the middle of the stream it will spin in a circle if i hold it above my head it will keep spinning slowly in a circle just like his radar i wonder if he using his skill as a diviner and the copper wire is doing all the work not his pvc antenna maybe i should start selling diving rods $5 for water $50 for gem stones $100 for gold as it works for me but there would be a lot of people that buy the rods and find that they don't work for them 8.(
Enter your email address to join: