Questions "Raised" by the video????
It is easy to make a short practical demonstration video to prove or dis-prove anything you want!!!!!!!!
These things need transparency!!!!!!!!
Let me state here I am not bagging Minelab, just trying to provide a voice of reason whilst we all get excited over this new offering.
There was zero mention of any of the timings or settings used when testing the 3 units in this video, to prove something, one only needs to dumb down the other detectors, we have all seen this before with comparisons.
To my way of thinking the target response they were trying to demonstrate on the GPZ was a little inconclusive for me (this may have something to do with the guy continuing to talk at that time ( I have a bit of industrial deafness) what I am saying is this could have been demonstrated Better!!!
Also to me there is potentially to much conductive material in proximity to the coil field, the guy in the hole has headphones & wireless module & to his left there is a pick that is about as close to the coil as the nugget, this may be nothing but I think they should have considered it.
When testing the SDC, I would be surprised if it could not pick up that target!!!! 21 oz lump (would be nice to know that depth) if it was run on 5
Just the way I see it, not bagging just raising legitimate ??? I am excited about it too, a mate of mine is getting one (Steve) and I put a deal to him to use it so see how we go.
cheers
Lee