- Joined
- Jan 27, 2015
- Messages
- 7,768
- Reaction score
- 12,894
Don't find any Booroolong (Nundle) frogs
liliane said:Hello, I don't believe it, science research does not lock up areas for that, it must be some other research like mineral research etc..., scientist can't do that, they get funded to do research for a period of time but then when their research is finished that's it, it seems to me that it is another matter and anyways, today, the law does not allow locking up areas without very good reasons, and there are plenty of land out there anyway, helping save the frogs will not affect anyone in anyway, if you have faith and open up to new ways things will only improve, there is a new generation of leaders out there who don't think the same way as the older ones and they do better jobs in not making the same old mistakes as their predecessors, so please help the frogs or any other environmental cause because we are doing it for the future of our kids and theirs , cheers thanks for reading me
MegsyB007 said:Did anyone else have to bisect a frog in biology class?
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: you could not of said that better 110%i agree with yousnafu said:Liliane, I commend you for your passion, but you must be living in a different universe if you believe that the flow-on from environmental studies and research has no effect on the issue of land being locked up. It has happened and still is happening on the Central Qld gemfields and the lock-outs that have occurred were made not just by research conducted by government agencies, but also by various university groups with the information gained very heavily biased by ideology and not so much hard facts. A good example of this are the 'no go' areas proclaimed around the gemfields after a study found that brigalow once grew in certain places and it was recommended that all mining activity be prohibited in these places to enable it to grow back, regardless of the fact that the only mining that had occurred in these places was all underground which had no effect on surface vegetation.
There is a big injustice in the way environmental protection information is used. The little man gets locked out of areas whilst a blind eye is turned towards the big mining companies who are causing more damage in a day than all us small players combined can cause in a lifetime.
Jeff
BigWave said:I like frogs too, although we have given them our own names.
One we call the "Race Caller", because when they start up they sound like 100 horse race callers talking over each other.
A couple of the other names I won't mention
This study is mostly looking at frogs in inner and outer urban areas - I'm OK with that.
Hey MackkaMackka said:Hey BW, sorry mate, I know this is a very important subject as for many years now I have listened to people saying that the frog population is decreasing and so is the bee population and we all know that if bees don't pollinate fruit trees, flowers, vegetables etc. we don't eat.
So lets get behind BW and help out.
Although I live next to a nature corridor I don't see or hear many frogs probably due to the enormous array and quantity of birdlife, however I will take notice and report ant findings.
Regards
Mackka
Ramjet said:Interesting topic. Our company wanted to by land to build a rail yard. It was during the initial studies that they found some rarish breed of frog. Killed the whole deal.
Another similar thing was that they used to weed spray our yards but have stopped it a few years ago. Not because the chemicals are bad for us, I'm sure they are, but because of potential harm to wildlife such as frogs, small birds etc. To be fair the rail yard is built on the edge of a HUGE mangrove area which is a breeding area for all types of wildlife and sea life.
Putting my Mods hat on now. Please stay on topic and keep the politics out of it. Thanks.
Enter your email address to join: