StoneTheCrows said:
Out of all financial assets, Super is the one MOST likely to be seized by a government in a financial crisis.
Before asset prices fall the current value of all monies in Super will pay off the National Debt around 4 times with change.
If you followed the tax debate on Super last year from about this time of the year to federal budget, you would have heard some of the scary proposals. :N:
Some media outlets and certain political parties don't like it how some people have super and some don't? Women normally have lower balances partly due to them taking time out of the work force to raise children etc. Nearly all the self employed people i know do not have a single cent invested in Super as the government does not force them to contribute? Unemployed people also have no money in super along with recent arrived immigrants.
In the debate many were pushing for increases in taxes on Super? There excuse being they wanted to fund those who don,t have super? Also they are wanting to halt lump sum super payouts? Scrap discounts like tax free super once you retire?
Normally top end of town gets untouched by any changes? Turnbull's $180,000,000 AUD is safe? :N:
You can bet the future holds significant doubt for anyone with any money held within a super fund and that also is true for self managed accounts.
I bet my entire net worth i will be robbed of my personal savings to pay for others retirements.
Super is nothing but a grand ponzi scheme. Holding cash in a bank is also a significant risk.