stalker said:
Goldtarget said:Ever had any really good days out that way Wolf? Its further south than i normally venture but have had a few reports of good finds, I'm guessing due to the fact its not as well known for producing as say the whipsticks etc, and less detector traffic.
Tassie Daz said:pmcoils
WalnLiz said:Coyote said:Hi Wal,
Have you had the chance to test the 2 machines with Mono coils fitted to both? Or have I missed the report?
Cliff
Jeff and I are doing the final tests on the 5th of April and the vid edit will take about a week. We have had to coordinate suitable times for testing and as such it has not been a speedy progress, nor did we want it to be.
Cheers Wal.
Howdy Jindy Gold being a 5000 owner and keen prospector I find your comments a little harsh, I saved and sold a lot of gear to purchase a 5000, which certainly doesn't put me in the category of ANAL or part of the 5000 group, I go out detecting with a mate who uses a SD2100Jindy Gold said:Ok just had to jump in and clear some miss conceptions about this machine.
this information has been provided by my brother who is in the industry and flies all over the world working in mines and prospecting.
He is a fitter and specialises in repairing and setting up mines. Hes been to mongolia PNG ,many countries and all over australia.
Here is his info he has passed onto me.
1. the GPX and ATX cannot be compared
2.They are different machines built differently to the way they find gold.
3. The GPX 5000 has a major flaw, Even admitted by Minelab. in regards to missing certain nuggets in certain soil conditions. (kalgoolie wa, Southern NSW snowy region) the ATX found them when the minelab didnt.
4.The 5000 is way overpriced for the technology involved .
5. The ATX is using different electronics to get the machine to work better at ground balancing and how it finds the gold. I wont go into details here as the info is available from them...they have their own techs doing great stuff.
6. the ATX is waterproof so this itself matters to the design of the unit. If you need your detector to be waterproof then there is no question its the better of the 2.
7. Having tested thoroughly in all world conditions By my brother..the ATX found just as much gold as the 5000..in highly mineralised ground high in iron, the ATX outperformed the 5000. and in water conditions and very high salt the ATX out performed the 5000. in snow...yes snow the ATX won hands down.
8. the ATX is a better beginner detector, Feedback from his students and people he trains in mines.
9.Sales of the 5000 have dropped significantly worldwide and not just because of unrest in african countries.
10. Minelab are working to release a detector similar to the ATX...price wise and use wise.
His fair dinkum know crap analasys of his work with minelab and ATX have come to the conclusion.."buy whatever unit fits your budget as they are as good as each other and as bad as each other. if waterproof is needed the ATX hands down, If your rich.. buy a 5000. if you dont like wearing all the gear get a ATX. if you need to smuggle your detector somewhere illegal get an ATX. if your simple..Get an ATX. if you are putting in mega hours and are preparred to learn the 5000 then get one. If you are anal and want to be part of the 5000 group..get one. if your sensible and are on a budget get an ATX
NOTE: i do not condone illegal practises..well in regards to prospecting anyway..
bottom line with everything in life. do your own research buy the one that suits you.. But i can go on great word from a dead set life long expert in gold recovery who has used probably every detector out there for years both units are great.
its not the unit its how you understand it. There are many professionals who own stores , are known people and who frequent wa etc and have all the whizz bang stuff and will force a 5000 on you.. id sooner take a proper review from someone i trust someone who has actually used them around the world and here in oz..
ASK the question. how many of you 5000 guys have actually used it in the snowy mountains southern nsw area....try ground balancing one in certain places here if you dont know what you are doing.
Please note i am no way representing either manufacturer or that i even really care. just putting in some words from my brother..A proper expert.
Any way my last 17g in nuggets was found in the ingebrya state forest just out of jindabyne without a detector or sluice... just by studying the land and using old age information..and digging a hole..
Tassie Daz said:Yeh, I agree GT I could scratch around all day long for a sub-grammer. I reckon the issue here is finding new ground and then sweeping it clean. Sub-grammers are fine if the recognized goldfields are the only place to go, but then you are only one of hundreds who are continually at the place looking over the same place. The art to this pastime is to find new ground and the only way to do that is to be able to get new land opened up to the recreational fossicker so that he /she can enjoy that pastime. If there are full time prospectors amongst the forum then I know that will upset some, but the aussie open spaces are for all to enjoy. [That said, I don't know how it could be policed anyway!]
Enter your email address to join: