I really hoped, when I started this thread, that it would be kept on topic, and peoples views and opinions would be respected.
I made a few comments about how my original QED was difficult to use on some patches of ground I work.
I stand by that.
On other areas, its an absolute pleasure to use.
Its two biggest weaknesses in my opinion, are the audio, in that you need to buy headphones that are compatible. I have a set of ss300,s that are great on a GPX, but because they are mono, I have to pull the plug half way out. I had a set of detecnix wireless phones, that were just about useless on the QED, so I sold them. The transmitter seemed to interfere with the QED, and the volume is not good. I settled on my daughter's $20 Phillips headphones for her DVD player, and they are much better, but not great.
Second weak point, is as Rick pointed out, in variable ground, you need to re ground balance every few steps in some cases. The new auto GB is very good.
All in all, it is a powerful machine, that will find gold, is lighter than all other machines, and is very versatile.
It punches deep, and is very very sensitive to small targets. In my area, it is no match for a zed. But close to a 4500, auto ground tracking, however makes the 45 easier to use. As for EMI, I have noticed that the QED suffers about the same as the GPX....in my area anyway. In one particular area, close to a highway, its cops it bad. Could be the military, as there are several places that cop it bad, the GPX and ZED are the same.