A few to many drinks last night, my apologies?????
Just a consultant who advises major mining companies on working palaeovalley gold.
A few to many drinks last night, my apologies?????
Just a consultant who advises major mining companies on working palaeovalley gold.
I'm happy to give advice but obviously not if not wanted.A few to many drinks last night, my apologies
Yes, that drive can be seen to be in ancient bedrock (Ordovician) below the gravels (Cenozoic). It was normal to put haulage drives in bedrock then rise up into the gravels, otherwise one would lose access as one mined the gravels - Ordovian rocks were quite solid and stable as a rule.Site manager panning with a shovel for scale of depth..
View attachment 5824
I get paid well so time is tight, had my pan in my digger today and managed to sneak down and do a quick 1 pan sample from the top of the gravels coming out of that drive..Yes, that drive can be seen to be in ancient bedrock (Ordovician) below the gravels (Cenozoic). It was normal to put haulage drives in bedrock then rise up into the gravels, otherwise one would lose access as one mined the gravels - Ordovian rocks were quite solid and stable as a rule.
Yes, they would commonly sink a shaft all the way into bedrock then drive a "haulage" or "reef drive" ("reef" meaning hardrock) underneath the lead and parallel to it, often with rails and of reasonable diameter, putting up rises and putting in a "wash drive" above in the base of the gravels. They would then block out and remove the "wash", commonly sending it down the rises and back along the haulage drive back to the shaft and up the shaft to surface. That way, although they put in timber supports while blocking out wash, it did not matter if the very wet wash drive periodically fell in after they took out the wash - they still had a continuing haulage to follow beneath the wash. It also meant they did not have to haul long distance along the wet and unstable wash drive through ground they had already taken out. Not always done that way, but common.Are you saying they actually sunk shafts deeper than the paleo channel and drove along it then dug shafts upwards to the channel and it's branches? Do you have a picture e.g. pls?
Good. Looks like the gold was coming from close nearby - very angular not rounded> Be good if you could sneak in a bit more!I get paid well so time is tight, had my pan in my digger today and managed to sneak down and do a quick 1 pan sample from the top of the gravels coming out of that drive..
View attachment 5842
Usually leads were exposed on hillsides at the head of the lead - they would then work their way deeper and deeper as they followed the lead down the palaeovalley (which could sometimes even be at right-angles to modern valleys. Once they got some understanding they would sink shafts or bores at greater depth to explore for the continuation. The old churn drill was a very cheap method by the late 19th century but it was shafts and hard yakka before that (which is when 90% of the alluvial leads were mined, most prior to 1865 with a brief and deep resurgence in the 1870s). Amazing what you can do if you are hungry enough, and if the reward might be 10 or 20 years income in less than a year. A lot died with water rushin in - 19 at one event in Creswick, 5 at another in Creswick, but in the early days deaths could be 30 per month in places like Ballarat.gTo dig to that depth by hand, how did they know mate?
Killing it it's a lot better than what's been in any bucket I've handled in the last few years. All power to you mateOnly need 17 buckets per gram
View attachment 5921
A few jealous GPX6000 owners out there drooling over your glory bucketOnly need 17 buckets per gram
View attachment 5921
Don't get enough time mate, plus it's not worth the effort.Any chance of classifying onsite so you bring less buckets but more gold per bucket?
Enter your email address to join: