madhatter said:Eldorado said:Too right Davent,pretty ordinary that a $3000 detector needs to be Band-Aid fixed with a berrocca container,toilet roll or a McDonald's straw. :N: :N: :N:davent said:You would think that after, what,? 4-5 years since the release of the sdc2300, minelab would have addressed this issue? Seriously, that is piss poor. All they have to do is supply different batteries.....
Agree.. :Y:
Before this thread started I assumed they had the same rechargeable batterys the GPZ has and a recharge kit "8.(
That's really a massive let down!!!! :N: :N: :N:
Considering the price and level of engineering that went into producing such a fantastic machine.
Such a shame to hear this.
Ummm don't reckon a GPZ battery system would work too well on a fully submersible , waterproof detector
You need a o ring sealed cavity as designed .
"As I said, I'm not putting the SDC down at all.
Just minelab's choice of power supply for it, when it didn't have to be that way. ] "
Backhand compliment : Yes you are and yes it did.
"I wouldn't be very impressed spending $3000 to put C cell battery's in it and have to replace them all the time :N: "
Misinformation : have not replaced mine in 3 years :
As far as I am aware anyone can comment on anything within forum rules , my point being I have seen this exact topic discussed at least three times over the years always with same result . SDC user happy after quick fix no issue , then topic is continued by non SDC owners carrying on with unwarranted negativity perhaps just human nature !
Having said , still agree new machines should be provided with better fitting batteries .