I got a SDC bungy from DD leather in anticipation of using the 17" a lot although I did read somewhere that it's very light too?
GPZ bungy would suit too :Y:
GPZ bungy would suit too :Y:
mbasko said:I got a SDC bungy from DD leather in anticipation of using the 17" a lot although I did read somewhere that it's very light too?
GPZ bungy would suit too :Y:
goody2shoes said:Been told by a person that owns a 6000 that it is not much heavier than a Gold monster and less than the SDC
It will be a great detector for a lot of people that have bad back's
It hits deeper than the SDC does
My friend has just been over ground that he has flogged and along with others have been over it.. and still found gold by using the 6000
He told me that this detector will reopen a lot of all ready flogged spots with the 6000
Interesting post from JP that helps me understand what I was noticing the other day:Ran in manual for a while & also in auto/auto+. Auto+ worked well there & found the majority of the gold. Maybe a little "ratty" for some but no mistaking metal targets.
Interesting to note that on testing one of the speccis that it could still easily be picked up in a manual sensitivity setting of 1. Plenty of grunt left. (6 - 7 was the best manual setting i.e. smooth running over the majority of ground but both auto modes worked well).
Thats very cool infombasko said:Interesting post from JP that helps me understand what I was noticing the other day:Ran in manual for a while & also in auto/auto+. Auto+ worked well there & found the majority of the gold. Maybe a little "ratty" for some but no mistaking metal targets.
Interesting to note that on testing one of the speccis that it could still easily be picked up in a manual sensitivity setting of 1. Plenty of grunt left. (6 - 7 was the best manual setting i.e. smooth running over the majority of ground but both auto modes worked well).
https://www.detectorprospector.com/...us-prospectors/?do=findComment&comment=163003
My takeaway from JP's write up is that Auto+ is the only setting he would run no threshold?kingswood said:Thats very cool infombasko said:Interesting post from JP that helps me understand what I was noticing the other day:Ran in manual for a while & also in auto/auto+. Auto+ worked well there & found the majority of the gold. Maybe a little "ratty" for some but no mistaking metal targets.
Interesting to note that on testing one of the speccis that it could still easily be picked up in a manual sensitivity setting of 1. Plenty of grunt left. (6 - 7 was the best manual setting i.e. smooth running over the majority of ground but both auto modes worked well).
https://www.detectorprospector.com/...us-prospectors/?do=findComment&comment=163003
Might see if I can get into auto+ and no threshold today....see what happens!
yeah thats what I think he meant too.mbasko said:My takeaway from JP's write up is that Auto+ is the only setting he would run no threshold?kingswood said:Thats very cool infombasko said:Interesting post from JP that helps me understand what I was noticing the other day:Ran in manual for a while & also in auto/auto+. Auto+ worked well there & found the majority of the gold. Maybe a little "ratty" for some but no mistaking metal targets.
Interesting to note that on testing one of the speccis that it could still easily be picked up in a manual sensitivity setting of 1. Plenty of grunt left. (6 - 7 was the best manual setting i.e. smooth running over the majority of ground but both auto modes worked well).
https://www.detectorprospector.com/...us-prospectors/?do=findComment&comment=163003
Might see if I can get into auto+ and no threshold today....see what happens!
I'm assuming that is to negate EMI effects with the higher auto sensitivity?
If EMI is low/not an issue I'd be still running with threshold.
When I used Auto+ the other day I was running with a threshold & found it ok.
I think the issue in Auto+ is more high sensitivity & getting atmospheric or environmental EMI from other sources like storms, nearby infrastructure etc.hermann said:if EMI is present, has anyone tried the headphones wired to the detector? If you can't hear EMI any more then the inbuilt loudspeaker could be the problem I think.
Thanks for that, appreciated. I'll try that out when the weather clears here. :Y:PhaseTech said:Just checked it with armrest at furthest point, and both shafts extended to red line, and I get 1.33m
Enter your email address to join: