Maths problem to solve while sitting around the campfire?

[RM Outback]

No worries guys , someone else have a go while I bask in the glory dosnt happen often :lol:

:lol: :beer:

 

[BigWave]

Sorry guys.
That was a misleading one.
Just goes to show you have to check ALL the clues.
It was deliberately designed like that...........

 

[RM Outback]

No need to apologise fact of the matter is I am not alone :beer: degree of difficulty isn't part of the equation :lol:

 

[BigWave]

OK Rob, over to you mate...........

 

[RM Outback]

No I'll pass thanks for asking :beer:

 

[Booney]

Was really hoping someone else would have a go but Id like to keep this thread going so heres an easy one .

 

[Manpa]

87?

 

[Nightjar]

Brain drains, now doing handstands and looking at the world in another perspective. Think you have cracked it Manpa.

 

[Booney]

87 is correct :trophy:

 

[Manpa]

Pretty straight forward this one.

 

[BigWave]

Your picture doesn't show the distance of the centre of gravity positions of the weights and objects from the central fulcrum, so I think it is impossible to know.
Only by calculating using the moments of inertia (requiring distances from the fulcrum), would that be possible.
If they were on a set of balancing scales though, I'd say 54kg?

 

[Manpa]

Bloody hell Bigwave its a year six problem, if I knew you wanted something tougher I would have rung my mate Einstein. Lol. layful:

Over to you cobber.

 

[diggit]

Your picture doesn't show the distance of the centre of gravity positions of the weights and objects from the central fulcrum, so I think it is impossible to know.
Only by calculating using the moments of inertia (requiring distances from the fulcrum), would that be possible.
If they were on a set of balancing scales though, I'd say 54kg?

 

[BigWave]

Sorry to be late. Here's another:

 

[RM Outback]

4 is my guess, determined by intersections in the lines :/

 

[BigWave]

Too quick RM - but good.
Over to you............

 

[RM Outback]

The following answer is correct how is it possible.

9 + 5 = 2

 

[Manpa]

Nine days plus five days equals two weeks?

 

[diggit]

The following answer is correct how is it possible.

9 + 5 = 2

Time + hours = Time

9am+5hours=2pm
9+5=2

 

[RM Outback]

Sorry Manpa not 2 weeks.