Detecting with Electroscopes

[blisters]

Karl what has magnetic resonance got to do with these devices?
Jon

 

[Ridge Runner]

Karl what has magnetic resonance got to do with these devices?
Jon

It is what the Scammers Claim they work off of,

 

[Zorgs]

Karl what has magnetic resonance got to do with these devices?
Jon

They probably have a transformer with a capacitor across a winding and a bit of poetic license.

 

[KarlS]

Based on the schematic - absolutely nothing. It is a scamm. Yet underlying physical principle is valid.
Karl

 

[blisters]

The device patent uses the term dielectrokinesis which is not a word and has no scientific basis. I use the word patent loosely here as a patent does not verify the invention actually works.
Jon

 

[Ridge Runner]

I stopped going on TNet Because I can't stand The LRL Crowd,, I hate Liars and Con Men,

John

 

[blisters]

I hear you rr.

For others who come across this thread here is a report on the problem of patenting inventions that don't work. In a nutshell even though an invention is proven to be a scam you'd need to go to the expense of proving this in court. Specific to this thread is the DKL lifeguard using dielectrokinesis and the device is proven to not work. However the scam continues.

http://hosted.law.wisc.edu/lawreview/issues/2006-4/rislove.pdf

Jon

 

[KarlS]

Based on the schematic - absolutely nothing. It is a scam . Yet underlying physical principle is valid.
Karl

 

[Ridge Runner]

In the U.S Some Makers and Retailers of these things where Actually Charged with Mail Fraud because they were using the U.S Mail Service to distribute these things and that Is Highly illegal to sell fake Item through the Mail system etc.

John