k man said:
Well said gold target.but your right! The taboo of tattoos and full arm sleeves is slowly starting to wash off in society. with the younger gen. Its almost spot the person without ink imagine if they all get discriminated at a job interview? In 25 years there will be no one left to work
I do see this discussion very interesting - and would like to share from another viewpoint.
Firstly the disclaimer - Personally I do not mind what people look like - I have moved past that many years ago.....
I used to work in an industry that was conservative and safety critical. Generally it would involve leading a group of like minded people that you have never met before. You would meet these people for the first time when you turned up for work.
In doing so - critical decisions needed to be made in the first 5-15 minutes that would effect the whole days events and the net result was making sure you ended up alive at the end of the day. So naturally, to make the best decisions, one needs to form an effective team - and very very quickly (note I do not use committee). So how do you do that......
Unfortunately - as we all do in life - it comes down to sterotypes. We all do it. It is subconscious thinking. We make a perception based on cultural influence, be it a haircut style, physical stature, eye contact, posture etc etc. We make this sterotype association within around the first 30 seconds of meeting someone.
When someone forms an opinion within around the first 30 seconds - it is can be difficult to change that perception. Again it is natural to think we are right (even subconsciously). So, by inference it can be seen, that it is difficult to prove ourselves wrong until the evidence leads that way......perhaps helping put that mower back on the trailer etc....
So we use this sterotype to form a team, and make critical decisions. I guess it is the old saying "...first impressions count".
I submit that for these reasons, people with "visible" tatoos were not selected in the industry I used to work in. Never saw 1 out of thousands of people. Likewise, people selected for the position usually were of similar nature, sometimes even similar looks - generally conservative and goal orientated. The technical skills of an individual were a given. The personality profile of the individuals could not be open to any adverse scrutiny due to the close proximity of meeting for the first time and making decisions. If one was seen to be "different" - it was difficult to form a team quickly and easily.
Although it is obviously a false assumption - if someone had have had a visible tatoo, it would be considered outside the normal profile, open themselves to individual scrutiny, and information they provided in the decision making process would be considered tainted or possibly corrupt.....open to question because they were different? Silly - yes! But I believe it is fair to say it is culturally an accurate description of how society acts. Is it changing - definitely not in that industry! Not even for the young ones. I don't believe it will in the future either. Other areas - I don't have the insight or experience to be able to share.
However, I also submit that outside our area of domestic life - some cultures in various countries see tatoos as the norm eg those in the highlands on Papua New Guinea, or the Maori in NZ. If you did not have appropriate tatoo markings, one might be seen as different and outcast from their society. Yet when you travel to such places as Japan, tatoos can be associated with organised crime and have the possibility of being ejected or refused entry to various places of business. In some countries, depending on the tatoo, one may be even be refused entry to that country.
Which brings me around to the question of what is the value of a tatoo? Is it a sign of belonging - to a family, club, team or other association? It is a sign to be different? Can a tatoo be used as sign of grief, or even of celebration? Or could it be recognition of achievement? Does it provide comfort or purpose? Is it a sign at all? When does it cross over to an expression or art? Is it superfluous to life's events? Will I buy a Mazda or a Honda? Drink VB or a Guiness? One thing is certain - it is an individual choice!
Never the less - what ever is its purpose, origin or meaning - it is an intentional and deliberate marking.
So - I believe there is no right or wrong answer for tatoos. However - what I do feel is that should one decide to have "visible" tatoos that it is for the right reasons. It is a deliberate act that has meaning. One needs to be aware that others around may not have the same understanding or conception of that meaning - particularly when wandering off into another culture or another country.
Some of the best blokes I have come across have had big chunky tats. Some of the biggest ****** losers have also had tats. What discriminates between the top bloke and the loser - not the tatoo!