Australian History

Prospecting Australia

Help Support Prospecting Australia:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Three parts to this answer,

It was tabled and past in Victoria parliament twice, in two consecutive years in a row, funding was available from England

1) what was it? and
2) what was it designed to do? and
3) why didnt it happen?

Good luck on this one
 
RM Outback said:
The rail line to the Melbourne Airport, oh hang on a minute :lol: that's been tabled about 40 times and still hasn't got off the ground :( :mad: sorry couldn't help myself :)
Sorry no , think mining
 
Ward69 said:
Three parts to this answer,

It was tabled and past in Victoria parliament twice, in two consecutive years in a row, funding was available from England

1) what was it? and
2) what was it designed to do? and
3) why didnt it happen?

Good luck on this one

If it happen, it could have been the riches goldfield in the world
 
Ward69 said:
Ward69 said:
Three parts to this answer,

It was tabled and past in Victoria parliament twice, in two consecutive years in a row, funding was available from England

1) what was it? and
2) what was it designed to do? and
3) why didnt it happen?

Good luck on this one

If it happen, it could have been the riches goldfield in the world
It was at the time - saved the Bank of England among other things.
 
In my research, there was in todays terms a royal commission on it with many miners summoned to court to give their opinions
 
It was driving a tunnel to from the Perseverance Mine on the Leigh, more than 6 miles to one of two feasible points about a mile and a half below the Leigh Grand Junction Bridge, to be funded by the government at a cost of 38,000 (and more to the north privately - there were many variations on the theme). It was designed to drain the Sebastopol Plateau and the Durham Lead.

Some felt the pumps would not provide adequate drainage, others suggested that the costs were underestimated, others that a far more extensive project would be required to do the job, others suggested that the returns of gold would be much lower than expected , and others that the leads might not be there as expected and that there would be little gold left.

We now know that the gainsayers were probably correct, that the geology was misinterpreted and that little gold could be expected (the leads are now known to have flowed north under the basalt, not south, and that the apparent southwards direction was because a much later river from the south cut its headwaters northwards into the old lead system (it was affected by uplift on the Enfield Fault), giving a younger system that drained south but with little gold (because most of the gold went north earlier, and because the younger south-flowing system cut a deep gorge in which little gold-rich gravel could accumulate - this was actually mined later but little gold was found).
 
goldierocks said:
It was driving a tunnel to from the Perseverance Mine on the Leigh, more than 6 miles to one of two feasible points about a mile and a half below the Leigh Grand Junction Bridge, to be funded by the government at a cost of 38,000 (and more to the north privately - there were many variations on the theme). It was designed to drain the Sebastopol Plateau and the Durham Lead.

Some felt the pumps would not provide adequate drainage, others suggested that the costs were underestimated, others that a far more extensive project would be required to do the job, others suggested that the returns of gold would be much lower than expected , and others that the leads might not be there as expected and that there would be little gold left.

We now know that the gainsayers were probably correct, that the geology was misinterpreted and that little gold could be expected (the leads are now known to have flowed north under the basalt, not south, and that the apparent southwards direction was because a much later river from the south cut its headwaters northwards into the old lead system (it was affected by uplift on the Enfield Fault), giving a younger system that drained south but with little gold (because most of the gold went north earlier, and because the younger south-flowing system cut a deep gorge in which little gold-rich gravel could accumulate - this was actually mined later but little gold was found).

You got it, your turn,

From my understanding, and I seen the start of the tunnel , walked in goes for about 300 meters

1901, 1902 is tabled and past to dig a tunnel to drain the water table under the then Sebastopol/Durham leads , but never happen, because of labour shortages at the time.

All yours Goldierocks
 
The original name of a gold-rich creek in the Walhalla-Woods Pont region that is now represented by two letters only
 
Want more clues? That earlier name was a typo - it should be Woods Point not Woods Pont (it is actually south of there, near Matlock)
 

Latest posts

Top