Hi Diginit , I will slightly correct my claim that I am pretty sure I would not have found that much more gold with a 6 or a 7 than what I have found with my 5000 .
I am certain that I would not of found that much more gold with a 6 or 7 .
As an example I/ we have a place close to Ararat called Snake Hill it is in the regional park , I'm pretty sure I am not giving any secrets away about that , It's in all the secret books and marked clearly on all the secret Doug Stone maps .
It's 5 minutes from home and I go there to test/try things out , the reason being it has been flogged by a lot of people for a lot of years with all types of machines dating back probably 40 years . EMI is an issue being not far from the highway and not a long way from One Tree Hill which has some communications towers which probably contribute as well .
As testament to the flogging it has had there is a patch there you will struggle to find a shotgun pellet of any size , the specific patch I am referring to is a surfaced area 10 metres by 20 metres taken down to the clay . It is obvious to every detectorist that goes there . hence the lack of targets .
In March this year I went there 4 times with my 5000 ( modified by the mechanic ) to test the machine fitted with a 12 in round evo and a new 12x8 evo . The 8 bits of gold in my avatar weigh half a gram exactly and were found on this patch with that machine and coils .
Over those 4 trips I would of worked that area for perhaps 8 hours and found 30 bits of gold and 15 or 16 very small shotgun pellets . The gold weighed 4point 8 grams the biggest being point 7 at depth in a small remnant area of quartz gravel/wash , I also found another 4 or 5 grams a couple of hundred metres away over a larger area that you wouldn't class as a patch .
10 of the shotgun pellets weighed 1 point 6 between them the other 5 or 6 were slightly bigger .
I went back again for a further couple of hours and found 1 or 2 shotgun pellets over the whole patch and was certain I had not missed much that the machine was capable of finding in my hands .
A mate of mine has a 6000 and as mates do I showed him exactly where i had found the gold , he spent a fair few hours there one day and found 8 or 10 bits for about a gram a bit further down the hill from where I got most of the bits I found . Some were in the same area I was concentrating on , no argument there , did he find much more , no
Last week I went back to that same patch with another one of the "mechanics" modified machines known as the f1a4 L4 it's best described as a quiet running machine capable of finding SDC size gold with the same ground handling abilities but better handling of EMI and works well with NF coils . The purpose of the trip was to test a sadie coil and some headphones and see if there was still any gold left in the now wet red clay . It was the first trip to the patch with the F1 , did i find gold , the answer is yes , 4 bits from point 05 to point 22 for a total of point 55 .
The next question I ask myself is , Would I have found all the bits that I got with my 5000 , and my mate got with the 6000 out of the defined patch with the F1 . The honest answer would be probably not , the .7 gram bit at depth that no one else had ever heard may of been been out of reach as well as a couple of deeper point 2s and 3s. that no one else had ever heard .
I can find little bits between .05 g and point 2 or 3 g in wet red clay from the surface to 6 - 8 inchs down with my machines in that flogged location , that have never been dug up by anyone else with any other machine . From the little I know about the game I doubt the gold goes much deeper in the clay in that location .
Do I need a machine worth 4 x the value of my work ute to find small gold , no
Fair chance this chapter about small gold in my area may start an argument , the next chapter will be about another specific patch on private property where we have been using the 5 , 6 and 7 . that has had a bit less of a hammering but has still seen plenty of detectors over the last 30 years that I know of .
Cheers Clod