I think you hit it on the head Diginit when you said that the average worker is struggling to pay his bills on an income less that what is recommended for retirement.
But I think the point that was trying to be made was does one really want to be struggling to pay bills after they are retired?
When you live on superannuation, no government or employer tops up your income to cope with inflation. You have to do that yourself from your own super.
A $67K super income may sound generous but but if that is all your super fund is capable of earning through investment income, then some years into retirement that WILL fall behind average earnings and the only way to keep pace would be to start eating into one’s super capital.
Using up capital can mean that your super may not last the distance and you could fall back into struggle town again with rising bills, health expenses etc sooner or later in your retirement.
Sad to say transitioning into a zero carbon future seems to be making things more expensive, energy, cars etc. so I would really have to agree that we should plan for a more expensive retirement.
For those of us already retired that may be too late but for those still working, time is an asset.