Have you considered another scenario with renting a house.
A lot of people say rent is dead money but I've found the opposite.
Here is an example I saw used once to explain it:
Suppose you buy a house for $750,000.
Alternatively you can rent that same house for $465 per week.
If you buy the house with an 80% mortgage it will set you back $40,320 per year in interest charges.
Yet if you rent that house it will only set you back $24,180 per year.
In cash flow terms, thats $16,140 you are saving each year.
In other words, youre making more from the rental home than the landlord.
Now if you put those savings into a bank account earning around 56% each year in interest that will earn you another $800 a year. Even more when its compounded.
So thats now around $17,000 per year you are saving renting.
Now the housing market works on roughly a 7 year cycle so thats between high house prices and low house prices. But that cycle has changed in recent years so its now around a 10 year cycle but for our exercise we will use 7 years.
Now for the renter thats $17,000 x 7 = $119,000 in savings without the hassle of maintenance costs, depreciation, etc.
For the owner thats $40,320 x 7 = $282,840 in interest plus whatever maintenance occurred in 7 years i.e. Painting house, re-carpeting, termites, plumbing, electrical, etc.
Now note how that properties value is assessed by the market.
Your house is worth next to nothing.
Its the land that gets valued.
Its the land that appreciates.
Your house may be knocked down by the new owner and and a new one built or a block of apartments put up.
In the 7 years the market may have been declining so the house that was worth $750,000 is now only worth $550,000 on the market.
Thats a potential loss of $250,00 on top of the mortgage outlays.
Now on top of that in those 7 years the State Govt or local council could have decided to rezone your land because of new developments, population increase, etc and they may decide to charge you more in rates or even potentially devalue your land value. If you are lucky it could actually increase your land value.
In the 7 years the market may have been improving so the house that was worth $750,000 is now worth $850,000 on the market.
Thats a gain of $100,000 less the mortgage outlays.
So you own a house and have an asset that you can borrow against if needs be but do you really need more debt you potentially cant afford to service?
Doesn't it make more sense to have savings in the bank and use cash to buy what you need rather than credit?
Do you leave your kids with a large mortgage to pay off when you are gone on the chance they might sell the house for a profit or do you leave them with a large bank account full of cash?
Is having the house as an asset really worth it these days?
The gap between owning a home and renting is decreasing rapidly each year, not just in Australia but worldwide.
My plan is to sell the house, rent somewhere, save up buy a caravan and then go travelling around Australia prospecting, find lots of gold and then rent another house when I am done travelling.