condor22
Mike
Gem in I said:.......However we still need our grids and supply for the majority of population to function, the more solar panels put up the higher the bill for everyone else....
Hope this helps the general sense of things and don't get me wrong I loved Adelaide when I lived there but is there still more hydroponic shops than servos, no wonder theirs power problems
After the initial ramp up of solar panels where people got more for their solar per kWH than they paid for their grid supply, those installing grid feed solar now will only get 6 cents or so nowadays. So where we are paying in excess of 30 cents kWH for grid power, that solar won't cost us more.
The bigger issue is that if there is too much solar input to the base load and there is a very quick cover of cloud over the sun, then the network gets a sudden loss of generation. This can cause an overload and then we get circuit tripped load shedding. That is also why the energy companies put a limit on the size of an individuals solar sizing. There has to be a finite limit on what % of direct input there is.
This is why in a caravan we don't actually use the power directly from a solar panel, but from a battery that is charged from the panel. The battery apart from supplying power after solar charging stops, acts like a shock absorber to the system. The grid is similar but on a much larger scale.
Given the latest press on the PMs 50% size increase in 4-7 years, I still don't hold much hope for a S.A. power improvement. Why do I think this way? Well, given that NSW gets 1st dibs on Murray water, followed by VIC even more and having seen the net result at the lower lakes in SA and the Murray mouth, I kind of think any excess power from the Snowies will head East well before it heads West. Therefore any additional base load generation within this State, for this State and managed by this State can only be a good thing.
BTW I did a Hydroponics search on the Yellow Pages - Adelaide 42 hits - Melbourne 60 hits, you were saying, lol