If you compare the new Nokta Impact with the Makro Gold Racer or Racer 2,there is little difference in the overall looks-the housings and screens look very similar,and one menu only to deal with.But Impact is cordless,has more features so you can use it anywhere and is heavier as a consequence.But due to its excellent balance it does not seem heavy.The only difference is in the price.It is $300 more than the Racer 2.The older FORS and FORS Gold detectors did not appeal to me due to the side mounted menu and old fashioned square box housings.Steve Herchenbach has posted a long article on the Finders forum stating it is one of the very few detectors that will accept a 40 cm coil without making it front heavy. Due to the Impacts good stability in very high mineralised soils the larger coil would still make it viable to look for nuggets in our soils,I dont think you would need to lower the frequency from 20 to 14 Khz and also reduce the gain but the option is there if you need it to make the larger coil more stable. I think Nokta should have made the Impact waterproof;that is the only criticism I have after 40 hours of testing it.I do like a VLF that goes deep,and the Impact has such a mode.It will go twice as deep as the all metal mode and give such strong signals that you will get far more target VDI,s as a consequence. The DEEP mode is not as affected by high mineralisation as the manual infers.It seems to plough on regardless and will trounce all metal every time for deep targets.I would recommend using all metal only to find much smaller targets and is much better at pinpointing them.