My takeaways from the Current Affair story:
- Grossly unfair to Neville (based on what he presented as fact). No consistency across other sites, seems to have gained traction there because of the publicity of being on AGH.
- Bit cautious of the question of "why my private property & why not the public land" though. Consistency is what's needed based on valid heritage reasoning like oldest diggings, significant history, public access & relevant learning value from them etc.
Just to say leave private land alone & put the orders over the public diggings opens up a whole other can of worms (for those with only public land access). Fair & valid appraisal of heritage value should apply to all lands with fair compensation to private landholders where well considered & scrutinised heritage values have been met.
Double edged sword IMO.
mbasko & Members;
Hello members.
Nev and myself thank you for the responses of your thoughts to the matter that we all viewed last night. I thought the show only gave a very brief outline on what has actually happened.
Heritage Victoria’s decision here, sets a precedent in law that leaves a lot of other people open to have similar thing happen. Not only to miners, but to our vast farming community out there, who think their land that is legally owned by themselves is untouchable.
Heritage Victoria can do as they like on this land, placing claim to as much property as they wish, because, to them it is a simple process to bulldoze their will upon the likes of any individual person out there.
There are many things that if bought them to the fore, it would upset lots of people. Nev and Mick have had to go to great lengths and expense, to fight these Government officials, they are a law unto themselves.
One instance was where Nev and his barrister, attended a convened hearing in Melbourne by Heritage Victoria. At the start of the meeting, on advice from his counselor, Nev stood up and addressed the meeting, that he was advising them he intended to record the hearing.
The man in charge said, you can’t do that, shut down your recorder, Nev replied he would not. So, the bailiff was ordered to escort Mr Perry out of the room.
Where he sat in the corridor throughout the hearing, leaving his Barrister to answer questions, he didn’t even get a chance to give his side of the story or ask any questions himself.
They decided to place a heritage order over approximately one third of his land, not only the diggings but with a 25-metre boundary outside the digs. (His total land being over 500 acres).
This now deemed heritage land, is not allowed to be farmed, but it must be maintained by the owner, he must pay the rates and charges as necessary on it. The Government does not compensate him for any loss of livelihood, farming or otherwise on this parcel of land.
They do not pay any public liability insurance on it, so if someone jumps the fence and is injured or killed, falling down a shaft, they are not held liable.
How can this be? What has Australia become under these Governments?
Sadly, it could be your turn next!!
Regards: ozziegold, John C.