G
Guest
5000 is a bigger number
4800 sounds just short
i really don't know
just being silly :lol:
4800 sounds just short
i really don't know
just being silly :lol:
Nuggetbuster said:http://www.minelab.com/aus/products...mpare&product1=23171&product2=23149&product3=
Main difference is that the 4800 doesn't have the Sensitive Smooth and Fine Gold timings, and it has a different salt timing.
Heatho said:Sensitive Smooth is for extreme mineralisation and difficult EMI situations, Fine Gold you can use in medium type mineralistion and it will detect small say .5g Gold nuggets reasonably deep.
Heatho said:Sensitive Smooth is for extreme mineralisation and difficult EMI situations
Redfin said:Heatho said:Sensitive Smooth is for extreme mineralisation and difficult EMI situations
which just about sums up the goldfields in Australia.
mbasko said:https://www.prospectingaustralia.com/forum/doc/member-docs/4485/1423654004_gpx-4500-vs-gpx-5000.pdf
I know it's company advertising but the charts are good for explaining the soil timings, uses & more suitable coil configuration (DD or mono) for use with them.
I reckon there's a lot of use in trying the different "suitable for location" timings on a patch & matching coils to suit i.e. not much use running your sadie in sharp or a 20" in sensitive smooth.
PhaseTech said:Think of the 4800 as a detector running on the newer 5000 platform, but it uses simplified 4500 settings.
It is harder to mess up, as several of the rarely used "special situation" settings are not there.
Performance wise though, the 5000 wins, as Fine-Gold definitely has a slight edge in sensitivity and depth, and Salt Gold will come in handy on the beaches, salt lakes, and in certain goldfields when the soil gets waterlogged. In very mild ground (and low EMI), Boost audio on the 5000 (and 4500) can help to bring out the faint targets.
As for Sensitive Smooth, I have been to only two places where I have had to use it if I wanted to stick to a Mono coil. Everywhere else Enhance with a drop in Gain has handled the bad patches - so the 4800 not having Sens Smooth isn't a big loss.
KIM-MARGARET said:Hi John
I purchased a new 4800 after much debate and forum input, which nearly headed me to a second hand 4500
After much thought and a run down from a mine-lab guy who certainly did not knock the 4500 he said the most important thing in the 4800 and 5000 compared to the 4500 is the ground balance in the two machines they are identical.
Now I purchased my 4800 with easy swing harness and a 14x9 nugget finder coil for $5,000.00 all new My 4800 is as quiet as a mouse and I have picked up 2 nuggets very small in worked area would I trade my 4800 for a 5000 no way My husband runs a 5000 so I am aware of what it can do.
Our last trip I got 2 he got nil
Margaret
Wolfau said:Price difference is only $700 between both as I checked ebay.
Enter your email address to join: