- Joined
- Sep 4, 2014
- Messages
- 8,938
- Reaction score
- 6,786
Does anyone have a link to that thread where everyone was trying to find the smallest bit with an SDC ?
J.
J.
hAyyoUinAU said:madtuna said:Always up for a beer Doug and thankyou! :Y:
Mr AUinAU can you please explain what you mean by this?
"SDC is specialised for its portability and water proof features, thus its lack in finding anything deep."
Because that reads to me like it wont find anything deep because it's portable and waterproof? Even though the SDC was by no means designed as a deep gold large nugget detector I can assure you it will find reasonable size pieces at reasonable depth if it passes over them.
But as I said that's not what it's designed for and not what I use it for. I use my GPZ for that, and if the ground is suitable I put on the 19" coil.
You also wrote..
"I can cover a lot more ground than using the SDC."
Yep 14" vs 8" not much of a contest there.
Except when you are reef or specimen hunting in amongst the rocks and boulders or around quartz or ironstone blows. Then you realize how much more ground you can cover with that little 8" than you can with the GPZ's 14".
Often it's not a case of how much ground you cover, it's how well you cover it.
For covering ground I'll head out with the GPX and an 18" coil.
SDC has good depth on big targets but so does a million other detectors, it is limited by coil size and power, and it will not pick up targets at depth period that ZED will scream on. PERIOD
The field from the 14" coil is great and I have not had any problems at all covering ground well..or squeezing into tight spots..under branches...etc....that doesn't make sense to me at all. SDC is for portability, and ruggedness, period, otherwise for that price, a 4500 with small coil can achieve similar outcomes tuned for small fine gold.
What I was saying is that ZED will find what the SDC finds and the 4500s and 5000s stock..., SIMPLE. If you can't believe that or think you also need a SDC to clean up what your ZED missed than something is wrong.
To me the ZED is like having a SDC and a GPX in one. And that is pretty much what it is really.
Ridge Runner said:hAyyoUinAU said:SDC has good depth on big targets but so does a million other detectors, it is limited by coil size and power, and it will not pick up targets at depth period that ZED will scream on. PERIOD
The field from the 14" coil is great and I have not had any problems at all covering ground well..or squeezing into tight spots..under branches...etc....that doesn't make sense to me at all. SDC is for portability, and ruggedness, period, otherwise for that price, a 4500 with small coil can achieve similar outcomes tuned for small fine gold.
What I was saying is that ZED will find what the SDC finds and the 4500s and 5000s stock..., SIMPLE. If you can't believe that or think you also need a SDC to clean up what your ZED missed than something is wrong.
To me the ZED is like having a SDC and a GPX in one. And that is pretty much what it is really.
In your own words you have only been Gold detecting since January, You Posted this on the 30th of July 2017, Two Months ago.
QUOTE:- AU Everyone, I am new to this forum. I have had the gold bug for over 6mths now and in that short time I have managed to achieve a little fortune. END QUOTE.
You are Arguing with people who have been in this game for decades, You got your GPZ on the 7th of August 2017, Less than 2 months ago, There is No way are you an Expert with it and know what you are talking about and you are repeating what you have read elsewhere, Trouble is some of that info is wrong, Some of the Guys here have owned their Zed's since they were released, and I would trust them over the people you are getting your Info from,
Yes the Zed can see very tiny nuggets but we have seen the SDC hit bits as small or smaller than the Possums noes on a 5c piece,
Buying the most expensive hobby detector on the market does not make that person an Expert or give them the right to dictate to talk down others who have forgotten more than most will learn.
Goldfreak said:Have read all the posts and appreciate every ones input in thread. Hayyouinau has used both machines so his opinion is relevent to me because I have owned neither. But if you want to talk gold prospecting with a spoon or making plastic sluice boxes I could add some thing.
madtuna said:Hi again Mr AUinAU,
as for ....."who are you to be going through posts that don't even relate to this topic." It does relate to this topic and the subject of depth with the SDC.
Often you'll see links in threads to previous topics. I've done no different here and did so to show a contradiction from you regarding the SDC's depth.
In the short time you've been detecting you've obviously had some measure of success, congrats. But don't rest on that. Honestly while the GPZ is a brilliant machine (and my favourite) don't believe it's the be all and end all of detectors. As others have stated, different tools for different jobs.
I'm not trying to start an argument and obviously I've hit a raw nerve. In post #30 you've written 'period' three times and it's dawned on me maybe you're having yours. so I apologize if I've got you on a bad day. :Y:
Lots of love
Steve
xxx
hAyyoUinAU said:I do listen to them, doesn't necessarily mean I have experienced the same things with those machines.
I haven't called anyone a liar, unlike some. I just voiced what I experienced and was quoted and attacked for having an opinion that is different to some.
I am not the only one who thinks so.
No arguing here, can we just keep it to the topic.
Maybe a video showing how the GPZ misses a target that the SDC gets would be good.
I was waiting for that :lol: :lol: :lol:aussiefarmer said:Well this thread is going well might go make some popcorn :lol:
Enter your email address to join: