Wolfau said:Heatho said:I've got the 15x12 on for the next trip, needed the bungy for that setup, going to get a NF 14 round soon too.
https://www.prospectingaustralia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=10885
May get one if they get good reviews.
Wolfau said:Heatho said:I've got the 15x12 on for the next trip, needed the bungy for that setup, going to get a NF 14 round soon too.
https://www.prospectingaustralia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=10885
loamer said:Don't shoot the messenger on this post - just reporting what has been on another forum. I think some of us can guess the test-pit so I have no doubt it's a very good pit. Also, I have also been told of this testing by some other people who highlighted the 1.56% improvement, which supports some other comments that the zed (7000) is marginally better. I guess we will all have to make up our own minds. I might add, this chart/report has caused a lot of chat.
"Day 1 tests on a 10 year+ established test bed (eroded gully with PVC pipes inserted in wall - typical Vic goldfields) 10 - 30 inches - gold nugget test targets
Day 2 swinging on a flattened lead with good variety of targets remaining."
https://www.prospectingaustralia.com/forum/img/member-images/981/1425379338_capture.png
WalnLiz said:loamer said:Don't shoot the messenger on this post - just reporting what has been on another forum. I think some of us can guess the test-pit so I have no doubt it's a very good pit. Also, I have also been told of this testing by some other people who highlighted the 1.56% improvement, which supports some other comments that the zed (7000) is marginally better. I guess we will all have to make up our own minds. I might add, this chart/report has caused a lot of chat.
"Day 1 tests on a 10 year+ established test bed (eroded gully with PVC pipes inserted in wall - typical Vic goldfields) 10 - 30 inches - gold nugget test targets
Day 2 swinging on a flattened lead with good variety of targets remaining."
https://www.prospectingaustralia.com/forum/img/member-images/981/1425379338_capture.png
Seen a few similar results from an extremely experienced "Professional Prospector" colleague of mine who sold his 5000 for a new 7000. Something more worrying to me from his results and obsevations, was a "Shadow Zone" from the coil config, which seems to not see certain mid sized nuggets at mid range depths that the 5000 easily picks up. Small shallow OK....large deep OK but need further convincing of much in between. :|
I'm getting hold of the 7000, and a modded 5000 from Woody next week and will run both against my standard 5000, in my own test areas, to see which in my opinion is the sharpest tool in the shed. I'm certainly sitting on the fence for several more weeks before I take any quantum leap to upgrade to what might not be the best bang for your buck. :/ My observations only and not intended to stir any wasp nests.
Wal.
Toysandthings said:Howdy all,
GPZ7000 metal detector back in stock.
Well we have another GPZ7000 metal detector
coming into stock tomorrow.
For anyone tempted by the zed...
WalnLiz said:loamer said:Don't shoot the messenger on this post - just reporting what has been on another forum. I think some of us can guess the test-pit so I have no doubt it's a very good pit. Also, I have also been told of this testing by some other people who highlighted the 1.56% improvement, which supports some other comments that the zed (7000) is marginally better. I guess we will all have to make up our own minds. I might add, this chart/report has caused a lot of chat.
"Day 1 tests on a 10 year+ established test bed (eroded gully with PVC pipes inserted in wall - typical Vic goldfields) 10 - 30 inches - gold nugget test targets
Day 2 swinging on a flattened lead with good variety of targets remaining."
https://www.prospectingaustralia.com/forum/img/member-images/981/1425379338_capture.png
Seen a few similar results from an extremely experienced "Professional Prospector" colleague of mine who sold his 5000 for a new 7000. Something more worrying to me from his results and obsevations, was a "Shadow Zone" from the coil config, which seems to not see certain mid sized nuggets at mid range depths that the 5000 easily picks up. Small shallow OK....large deep OK but need further convincing of much in between. :|
I'm getting hold of the 7000, and a modded 5000 from Woody next week and will run both against my standard 5000, in my own test areas, to see which in my opinion is the sharpest tool in the shed. I'm certainly sitting on the fence for several more weeks before I take any quantum leap to upgrade to what might not be the best bang for your buck. :/ My observations only and not intended to stir any wasp nests.
Wal.
lucky streak said:Want to know the coil that's on the 7000 can someone make the same coil for other minelab detectors. Could it be done I own a sd 2100 and want to get depth of 20% more ground.
lucky streak said:Want to know the coil that's on the 7000 can someone make the same coil for other minelab detectors. Could it be done I own a sd 2100 and want to get depth of 20% more ground.
Enter your email address to join: