Dragon Man
Ken
xcvator said:Looks good, what brand is it ?
http://www.micro-sluice.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=17&Itemid=167
xcvator said:Looks good, what brand is it ?
If you are not causing damage that the restriction was introduced to prevent , then it makes sense what you are saying.Dragon Man said:If you can't use Mechanical means (electrical, or petrol) in a creek or river when highbanking in NSW, but it is legal to recirculate a tub of water at home is it legal to recirculate your own water brought in from home if you set your highbanker up with a recirculating tank and a 12 volt pump, slightly away from the creek edge?
He's talking about using water in a tub at home that can then be thrown on the garden or lawn or whatever, not going back into the waterways so no absolutely no environment harm whatsoever.moeee said:If you are not causing damage that the restriction was introduced to prevent , then it makes sense what you are saying.Dragon Man said:If you can't use Mechanical means (electrical, or petrol) in a creek or river when highbanking in NSW, but it is legal to recirculate a tub of water at home is it legal to recirculate your own water brought in from home if you set your highbanker up with a recirculating tank and a 12 volt pump, slightly away from the creek edge?
Nobody wants the creek to be turned from pristine to *****.
seems ludicrous to say you can't smash the creek with a highbanker , but you can with a river sluice - smashed is smashed.
I have seen how dirty the water is after a days panning , and if I was a water living creature I would be unhappy.
If harm is being done then the harm needs to be prevented.
I guess the idea of highbanker bans is to minimize the harm done.
So in that case , your argument Dragon Man seems to overcome the legal issue , but does not overcome the moral issue of prospecting.