Is This Beyond the Pale

Prospecting Australia

Help Support Prospecting Australia:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Sep 12, 2016
Messages
1,960
Reaction score
4,078
Location
Mornington Peninsula
G'day

Not surprised really, desperate for money, the millions in profits they make already make from the blood sweat and tears of all types of producers, fruit and veggie growers and so on, the greedy sods, celebrity chefs should be distancing themselves from these pirates as **** sticks, this one will go up there on the fraud they conned us all in to with the millions they are making on plastic bags, save the environment my fat ass, its all about profits and that's all.

cheers

stayyerAU
 
Its just incomprehensible to think that they thought they would ever be able to get away with it
Besides this despicable act , the other place is no different when it comes to screwing producers ,just as stayyerAU above has said
 
That's the problem sandta,most of the time both company's do get away with screwing the producer's and deceiving the customers, because the ACCC is toothles and state and fed governments have let them get that big that they own the retail market in australia,the latest round of rule's and regulation these 2 company's have pushed through the food safety regulator's, will just about push the last of the small producer's to the wall ,the cost of implicating and management is out of reach or impossiable to implicate because of time wasted on the new regulations,hence they get what they want " full control of the wholesale and retail fresh market"
 
It was about 6-7 years ago that Woollies announced that they had just freed up millions of dollars in capital to buy bigger,
discount more, do works and buy more into the supermarkets competition battle.

The big plan was to stretch producers from 3 month payment cycle to a 6 month payment cycle, hundreds of producers went under
and lost everything, I doubt Woollies coughed up with their payment for goods.
The worst hit were growers, a mate of mine grew lettuce for them - a seasonal product.

The next breathe was to say that product was in short supply and they HAD TO buy from overseas to provide to our market.

A BIG boardroom con job !

I spend as little with Coles and Woollies as possible, less with K-Mart and Target, nothing with BigW, petrol only from CostCo.

Almost all my food $ go thru Aldi or a Specialty like local fruit and veg or butcher. (Aldi is ok for basics)

The change to "ATM scan your own goods" has me mystified, it is another "con job" on savings to keep those big boys alive,
we always go to a checkout person in those stores, if we have no alternative choice but to use the store (bloody gift cards).

Funny how the big boys keep saying they can do better cheaper and more efficient.
Mark my words, soon they will open "only" robotic stores that pick to order mechanically and delivers thru a hole in the wall
and bills direct debit from you with pickup or home delivery.
The food supply version of Amazon.

Local Target changed overnight, the single staff member had 9 irate customers in line within minutes of us, she could not get any
supporting staff as there are none there anymore - the scanning machines were working but it was too much for her to deal with
and I bet because of her age she was not about to throw the job.

Where id all the staff go after no longer having a job ?

What bonus's did the Management get for this move ?

If Aldi has come into our market and now captured 40% ? of the trade, another German player coming in and I think a US player too,
maybe Coles and Woollies are not getting it right, maybe they just need to develop new business models and ethics to rejoin the game.

This milk thing is only the tip of the iceberg, the very tiny tip.

I apologise for my rant.

;) :)
 
A company sets a goal of $100 million profit will complain that they LOST MONEY when they only made 90 million profit....... " we had a loss of 10 million ". this is the mentality of these tossers. i believe VERY LITTLE i hear from company leaders taking big salaries from shareholder's pockets.
 
One simple act of boycott till after Christmas of shopping elsewhere , Would show the CEO of Coles WHO REALLY IS THE BOSS OF COLES!
And it's us!!!
Woolworths would receive the $$$ from doing it correctly and not misleading us.
The massive extra $$$$ in Woolworths pocket as a reward would soon change their marketing approach and tactics leading from this.
Creating a new Australian public relations strategy.
And new gloves off fight between them both.
And NOT just around MILK either.
Perhaps adopting the DICK SMITH tactic.
And what great timing to do so is now at Christmas time shopping, when the CEO of Coles is rubbing his hands with his $20 million Xmas bonus!
 
Just like a petrol Boycott, they both WILL work, problem is getting everybody on board to actually do something together...

People will jump up and down and rant about it but a simple Boycott will make them see just how powerful the Public is... ;)

My 'check-out chicks' will still be there as they are needed to fix the continuous stuff ups by their 'Self-serve-isles'...
Going by the last weeks stuff-ups, they will have a job for-ever.. :D

LW....
 
As long as we have a capitalist society and value adding for shareholders, I doubt much will change - profit comes before anything else, including their social responsibility. With boards and CEO's looking to squeeze more profits from somewhere, it seems easier to hit those that can least afford to cop it vs truly adding value to the company by other means. Under pay your employees for a few years or pocket some of their super entitlements and that should add up to a tidy sum, not to mention the bonuses reaped for doing so - it's not like the penalties are enough to dissuade them from doing so, more than often just a drop in the ocean. You can always blame it on a computer error, always a handy way of deflecting direct responsibility.

What's the point of corporations rorting say 50 million from employees or suppliers over several years, and as a end result receiving a slap on the hand 7 million fine. It should have criminal repercussions attached to the financial penalty, and it should be strictly enforced to regain the trust and confidence of those affected.

Despite large corporations claiming that they adhere to their professed social responsibility, sadly I see little of it being practiced in recent years.
 
True, $ but $7 MILLION is less than his bonus!
Any fines he can pay alone out of his bonus to keep peace with shareholders happy!!
If the people did boycott Coles this month......
It would be the biggest turn around since Bastille day!
And the market would change!
 

Similar threads

Latest posts

Top