...No, there is definitely no distinction being made. I know those reefs on the spreadsheet and those that say only "Quartz worked" were all worked for gold. Some are well known gold mines...
Wow, there sure were a
lot of auriferous quartz reefs.
...Not sure why you are using the "Geological Lines and Faults 100k file" - it seems to be the hard way to do it (and I am unclear about your aim). Are you interested in detecting or in making maps...?
I am interested in detecting for eluvial gold. I thought by using "Geological Lines and Faults 100k file" (which displays auriferous reefs) that I could use the reef locations + contours to hunt for eluvial gold. I am curious why you think that would that be the hard way to do it? I will add the "mines and mineral occurrences" layer though and make subsets of it to only record hard-rock (not alluvial) gold mines. A lot of the "mine depth" attributes are -999 though. It would be better to be able to delineate more of the shallower ones to work out which ones are on shallow ground, I notice there aren't too many under 1 metre.
...Crosses are reef mines where I don't know the orientation of some reefs...
Are they not shown on "Geological Lines and Faults 100k file" at all?
...(and no my maps are not available - I do this for a living)...
So.... uhh... can I have your maps? Then we can both do this for a living.
Hey you never ask you never get, right?
Here is geovic showing me reefs in e.g. Wedderburn. I didnt have to trace all the reefs off the old maps. Its all there in geovic? It seems like you are doing it the hard way to me!?
View attachment 7836