mdv
Martin
I am lucky enough to have access to a gold-bearing creek on in-laws property, which I visit most weekends. I spent several days last week camped by the creek - communing with nature and having a spectacularly clear view of the lunar eclipse. After much sampling, I found a nice little patch on an inside bend which I proceeded to dig out.
I cleaned out the Walbanker after 3 buckets to check how things were going - see photo. In all, I managed 2.6 gm from this hole.
Most of the gold came out the topmost wash layer and its 1cm-3cm thick contact layer of pea-sized dark gravel sitting 15cm down and on top of the next wash layer. This second wash layer and its contact layer of similar pea-sized dark brown gravel a further 15 cm down held next to nothing (only 2-3 colours to the pan).
This second contact layer sits on top of grey/black clay on the upstream side of the large boulder, and on top of large flat-topped rocks/boulders on the downstream side of the large boulder (see photo). I found no gold at all on top of the flat rock/boulders or in the crevice between them.
But here is the dilemma. Should I attempt to dig down deeper through the grey/black clay in the hope of finding something beneath ... or is it more likely there is nothing more to be found here given the wash layer sitting above the clay was fairly barren?
Any suggestions welcomed.
Not a bad place to camp.
Result of putting 3 buckets through the Walbanker
Downstream side of large boulder - flat rock at bottom of hole and the crevice yielded zip - most of the gold came out of the uppermost wash layer (<15cm from the surface)
Upstream side of large boulder - bottom of hole is grey/black clay (difficult to see this in the photo) - should I punch down further?
How good does it get when you can have a campfire breakfast within a stone's throw of your next panning spot?
I cleaned out the Walbanker after 3 buckets to check how things were going - see photo. In all, I managed 2.6 gm from this hole.
Most of the gold came out the topmost wash layer and its 1cm-3cm thick contact layer of pea-sized dark gravel sitting 15cm down and on top of the next wash layer. This second wash layer and its contact layer of similar pea-sized dark brown gravel a further 15 cm down held next to nothing (only 2-3 colours to the pan).
This second contact layer sits on top of grey/black clay on the upstream side of the large boulder, and on top of large flat-topped rocks/boulders on the downstream side of the large boulder (see photo). I found no gold at all on top of the flat rock/boulders or in the crevice between them.
But here is the dilemma. Should I attempt to dig down deeper through the grey/black clay in the hope of finding something beneath ... or is it more likely there is nothing more to be found here given the wash layer sitting above the clay was fairly barren?
Any suggestions welcomed.
Not a bad place to camp.
Result of putting 3 buckets through the Walbanker
Downstream side of large boulder - flat rock at bottom of hole and the crevice yielded zip - most of the gold came out of the uppermost wash layer (<15cm from the surface)
Upstream side of large boulder - bottom of hole is grey/black clay (difficult to see this in the photo) - should I punch down further?
How good does it get when you can have a campfire breakfast within a stone's throw of your next panning spot?