This is from my September post on the same sort of issue. Its getting close to summer - be careful in there.
Good questions. Pine plantations can be quite problematic. Oddly enough, the older and bigger the plantation, the better for detecting. there are several areas in there that I did well on. Went back over the same area and was shocked to see the pines are gone and the tree litter (pruning and cutting operations) pretty well meant I was not a chance - it was just too deep, too many cut up branches etc. Spent most of my time climbing over things. A couple of general observations on Creswick.
1. Like most pine areas - it is wetter. Dayelsford is the same. Dunolly and Maryborough are drier. This has affected the erosion cycle, ground mineralisation etc.
2. The reefs tend to be ironstone and quartz and are harder than the sandstone and slates. What does this mean? - it is called erosion imbalance.
3. Ridges and hills are steeper and better defined as a rule. You will note that using topo maps around Creswick the contour lines are well defined - places around Dunolly etc are not. Sandstone and slate erode quicker leaving shallower gullies.
4. I have found that the erosion imbalance can mean reefs may run along ridges and over hilltops in the area. the plus here is that the pines in these places tend not to be as healthy - ground is harder.
5. The rows of trees are excellent for gridding - pretty hard to lose where you have detected.
6. Constantly check the layers of pine needles etc to get a gauge of the depth. The loam can get quite thick and a loss of depth.
People can get quite daunted by pine plantation detecting but it can be rewarding. Remember that Creswick is close to Ballarat and has had some attention. Also, in the last couple of years 'no detecting' signs have popped up on what is crown land - this must be a local rule and I have yet to check with the PMAV as to what the legality is of these forestry signs. It is also worth checking the harvesting schedule as tracks will be closed in several areas.