sorry if this is a hijack,
I have been detecting a fairly similar site and the nugglets I have retrieved have generally been in the darkest red or orange areas with the most minerally look that nearly sparkles , but a couple were in water courses and I believe they had washed there. I am pretty lucky as I am 99% sure no ones touched the site for a hundred years.
I am really struggling to decipher exactly how they dug and worked the site. in greencheeks last photo there is a mound behind the pond between the trees , is this tailings heap or a undug area ? if its undug would they have had gear working on it or was it deemed to be barren ?
the site I am playing with has many of these mounds and the trouble with my site is the ground looks hard but it is very loose to work, even out of the surfaced area it looks like a pick would barely mark it, but it is loose and you can nearly drag a pick through it. all this makes it very hard to figure what has been dug and what hasn't .
they seem to have dug willy nilly with trenches 4 to 12 ft deep from original ground level in allsorts of directions with most of the ground between dug 2 to 3 ft . there are many mounds that look totally undug some with stones piled on them some with out. are these barren ? or would sieves and rockers been on them ?
there is very little bedrock and they seem to have dug to a clay level and stopped generally .
as I said it baffles me to how they worked it as there would be 5 different colors of ground in the area dug and as much work was done in each , there is a creek 100 meters away at about 20 meters lower , would they have taken the dirt to the water or the water to the dirt it seems like the dirt has gone .
I know its hard without pictures but I am not willing to do that publically and yes I probably should have started my own thread but it sorta fits here , so any help would be good even diagrams of how other old sites were worked.