gday, another very long,and boring night shift.
Browsing forums,articles about metal detecting tech.
So, found a great article, or interview with Dave Johnson and John Gardiner, 2 engineers from Fishers.
What I found interesting were the questions they answered on getting more depth.
Question 6:
DS: Are we about maxed out as far as how deep VLF units will go? In your opinion, whats the biggest obstacle for current technology in achieving increased useable detection depth?
Dave: "Getting extra depth out of a VLF, multifrequency, or PI machine is very difficult, because these machines follow an inverse 6th power law relationship between signal voltage and depth. If everything else is maintained equal, doubling the depth requires 64 times as much signal. If this is done by increasing transmitter power, doubling depth requires 4,096 times as much battery drain. Thats the basic reason why depth increases come so slowly in this industry.
The biggest impediment to getting usable depth in the ground, is interference from magnetic and electrically conductive minerals in the ground, which can produce signals hundreds of times as strong as that of the metal target youre trying to detect and hopefully identify. There are several approaches to extracting the metal signal from the ground mineral signal, but they all have their limitations. Thats why you see several different technologies coexisting in the market."
John: "Dave points out biggest obstacle which is seeing target through the Ground and Air interference."
Browsing forums,articles about metal detecting tech.
So, found a great article, or interview with Dave Johnson and John Gardiner, 2 engineers from Fishers.
What I found interesting were the questions they answered on getting more depth.
Question 6:
DS: Are we about maxed out as far as how deep VLF units will go? In your opinion, whats the biggest obstacle for current technology in achieving increased useable detection depth?
Dave: "Getting extra depth out of a VLF, multifrequency, or PI machine is very difficult, because these machines follow an inverse 6th power law relationship between signal voltage and depth. If everything else is maintained equal, doubling the depth requires 64 times as much signal. If this is done by increasing transmitter power, doubling depth requires 4,096 times as much battery drain. Thats the basic reason why depth increases come so slowly in this industry.
The biggest impediment to getting usable depth in the ground, is interference from magnetic and electrically conductive minerals in the ground, which can produce signals hundreds of times as strong as that of the metal target youre trying to detect and hopefully identify. There are several approaches to extracting the metal signal from the ground mineral signal, but they all have their limitations. Thats why you see several different technologies coexisting in the market."
John: "Dave points out biggest obstacle which is seeing target through the Ground and Air interference."